Tool use is uncoordinated
Staff use ChatGPT, Copilot, plugins and templates without a common process or agreed controls.
Quilliam AI assesses where AI can improve a defined process, implements the agreed system and trains the relevant staff to operate it.
Scope and approach
Based in Cornwall. Working throughout the UK and remotely.
Most UK businesses already have access to AI tools.
The relevant commercial issue is whether those tools improve a defined business process.
Quilliam AI reviews recurring work, system dependencies, data, risk and staff responsibilities.
Each engagement begins with a specific process and an accountable owner.
We design and implement the agreed system, apply appropriate controls and test it against representative examples.
Training, documentation and handover requirements are included in the agreed scope.
The intended result is a controlled system that your team can operate and review.
Many teams already have access to AI tools. Business value depends on selecting an appropriate use, setting measurable objectives and integrating the system into normal operations.
Staff use ChatGPT, Copilot, plugins and templates without a common process or agreed controls.
Lead management, reporting, support, document handling and administration still depend on copying information and individual memory.
The business has not defined permitted use, approval requirements or responsibility for checking output.
Proposed AI work has no agreed baseline for time, cost, quality or service improvement.
What we do
Each engagement has a defined scope, stated deliverables and an agreed handover to the responsible team.
We review recurring administration, follow-up, customer enquiries, reporting and handovers to identify measurable cost or delay.
Output: AI opportunity assessment
We select a suitable process and agree the scope, responsibilities, controls and success measures before implementation.
Output: Defined project scope
We integrate the workflow with the agreed tools and data, then test it against representative examples before release.
Output: Tested AI workflow
We train the relevant staff to operate the system, review its output and follow the agreed maintenance process.
Output: Training and handover documents
Services
Opportunity analysis identifies a suitable first project. Team training establishes consistent use. Implementation delivers an agreed workflow, automation or internal tool.
For owners
We assess where AI can improve a business process and recommend the appropriate first action.
For staff
We train staff to use AI in routine work, based on their roles, responsibilities and current processes.
For owners and operations teams
We design and implement AI workflows, automations and internal tools for agreed business processes.
Case study
VetVision AI is a University of Nottingham spin-out. Its camera systems monitor animal welfare in equine and dairy environments.
Client
University of Nottingham spin-out
Quilliam AI was engaged to improve product presentation, customer onboarding and operating processes. The work included search content, a branded onboarding portal, farm mapping, camera setup and defined internal AI implementation support.
40 to 95
Approximate change in the recorded SEO score
AI product
Revised presentation for equine and dairy welfare monitoring
Live portal
Branded onboarding and operations workflows released
Increase
Reported website visibility, visitor numbers and enquiries
Revised the presentation of the camera-based animal welfare product for equine and dairy customers.
Developed a branded portal covering initial customer setup and implementation.
Documented the internal process for farm mapping, camera placement and replacement planning.
Supported defined internal AI uses and improvements to operating processes.
Use cases
Suitability
The process should recur, operate within defined limits, have an accountable owner and carry a measurable current cost.
The same type of email, decision, report, triage, update or handover occurs regularly.
Relevant examples, policies, constraints or decision patterns are available for review and testing.
A named person can approve, test and maintain the workflow after release.
Time, delay, missed follow-up or inconsistent quality can be measured against an agreed baseline.
Principal consultant

Levi Quilliam
Quilliam AI is led by Levi Quilliam. His experience includes turnaround and restructuring at Deloitte, followed by technology roles at Halter.
FAQ
Quilliam AI assesses suitable uses of AI, implements agreed workflows and tools, and trains the relevant staff to operate them.
We provide advisory and implementation services. A typical engagement may include process assessment, system design, implementation, controls, testing, training and documented handover.
Yes. We work with small and growing UK businesses where recurring administration, owner dependencies or manual follow-up present a defined opportunity. An internal AI team is not required.
A focused workflow can often reach pilot stage within several weeks. Timing depends on scope, data access, system dependencies and the required controls. We confirm the delivery plan before work begins.
We quote against an agreed scope, taking account of the process, data, systems, risk and handover requirements. As general guidance, training usually starts from £500. Small implementation projects may cost approximately £2,000 to £3,000. Medium projects may range from £5,000 to £50,000. Larger programmes are usually above £50,000. We provide a written scope and fee before paid work begins.
We agree controls according to the process and risk. These may include restricted permissions, limited data access, human approval, test cases, audit logs, fallback procedures and named owners.
Quilliam AI is based in Cornwall and works throughout the UK, including remote delivery. In-person assessment, training and implementation sessions are available where agreed.
Initial assessment